Section |
Geoecology |
Title |
GEOECOLOGICAL CERTIFICATION OF THE NATIONAL PARK "LOSINY OSTROV" (ELK ISLAND) TERRITORY |
Сontributors |
I. S. Krotkov, post-graduate student of the Department of Soil Science, Ecology and Nature of State University on Land Use Planning |
Abstract |
The article deals with geo-environmental problems of the natural complex of the National Park “Los iny Ostrov” (Elk Island) which is under the constant impact of the urban environment for a long time. The certification of the National Park is proposed for the prevention and reduction of human impact on its natural complex. Due to the application of the geo-ecological passport, the efficiency of data collection and processing, comprehensive monitoring and timely decision-making on the prevention of negative impacts and the preparation of reports on the ecological effects of the proposed decisions about the Park, its protective zone and the adjacent land areas of the city of Moscow and the Moscow Region increase. The application of this method would enable to expand the list of tasks and to increase the validity of the proposed design solutions for the conservation and restoration of natural systems. |
Keywords |
specially protected natural area (SPNA), National Park, urban agglomeration, urbanization, natural complex forest communities, certification. |
References |
1. Andreev M. D. Geojekologija i obshhestvo [Geoecology and society] [Text]. Moscow: “Sputnik+”, 2014. 180 p. (in Russian) 2. Astashin A. E., Cheburkov D. F., Ryzhov E. V. Landshaftnaja differenciacija territorii Pavlovskogo Zaoch’ja [Landscape differentiation of the territory of the Pavlovsk Trans-Oka Region] [Text]. Vestnik VGU Series: Geografija. Geojekologija, 2014. No. 2. P. 30—34. (in Russian) 3. Kochurov B. I., Ivashkina I. V. Rol’ otkrytyh prostranstv v podderzhanii jekologicheskogo balansa v krupnom gorode [The role of open spaces in the maintenance of ecological balance in a large city]. Jehologija urbanizirovannyh territorij [Ecology of the urbanized territories], 2014. No. 1. P. 6—13. (in Russian) 4. Dearborn D. C. and Kark S. Predposylki sohranenija bioraznoobrazija v gorodah. Sohranenie bioraznoobrazija [Motivations for conserving urban biodiversity. Conservation Biology]. 2010. 24 (2). P. 432—440. (in Russian) 5. McKinney, M. L. Urbanizacija, bioraznoobrazie i sohranenie. [Urbanization, biodiversity and conservation]. Bionauha [BioScience]. 2002. 52. P. 883—90. (in Russian) 6. Miller J. R., Snyder S. A., Skibbe A. M., Haight R. G. 2009. Prioritetnye zadachi dlja sohranenija prirodnoj sredy v stremitel’no urbanizirujushhemsja landshafte. Landshaft i gradostroitel’stvo [Prioritizing conservation targets in a rapidly urbanizing landscape. Landscape and urban planning]. 2009. 93. P. 123—131. (in Russian) 7. http://elkisland.ru/news/o_rezultatakh_raboty_gosudarstvennoj_inspekcii_nacionalnogo_parka_s_08_08_2016_goda_ po_14_08_2016_goda/2016-08-19-983 (in Russian) |