THE ASSESSMENT OF ANTHROPOGENIC IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT OF THE SUMMER HOUSES IN THE VLADIMIR REGION IN TERMS OF HOUSEHOLD ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT

Section

Ecology

Title

THE ASSESSMENT OF ANTHROPOGENIC IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT OF THE SUMMER HOUSES IN THE VLADIMIR REGION IN TERMS OF HOUSEHOLD ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT

Сontributors

T. A. Trifonova, Ph. D., Dr. Habil., Professor, Lomonosov Moscow State University), This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.;

K. O. Karapetyan, PG Student, Vladimir State University named after Alexander and Nikolay Stoletovs, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Abstract

The article describes the results of a research on the environmental impact of individual country sites of the Vladimir households in terms of ecological footprint (EF). The survey has been conducted among 62 households and it served as a source of data on the resources consumption by the members of the households. Ecological Footprints of the households have been calculated with the help of the software “Ecological Footprint Calculator”. A comparative ecological footprint analysis of two types of households has been made, with and without the country houses. It was revealed that the ecological footprint of the country houses owners was 23 % higher. It is shown that an in-crease in the environmental load is caused mainly by the higher consumption of energy, construction wood and more intensive use of transport by the country houses owners. The increased burden on the ecosystem is manifested in the carbon footprint growth and additional demand for wood.

Keywords

ecological footprint, country house, suburbanization, the Vladimir Region.

References

1.  Nefedova T. G., Pokrovskij N. E., Trejvish A. I. Urbanizacija, dezurbanizacija i sel’sko-gorodskie soobshhestva v us- lovijah rosta gorizontal’noj mobil’nosti [Urbanization, de-urbanization and rural-urban communities in the conditions of growth of lateral mobility] // Sociologicheskie issledovanija. 2015. No 12. P. 60—69. (in Russian)

2.  Trejvish A. I. GOROD, RAJON, STRANA I MIR. Razvitie Rossii glazami stranoveda [CITY, DISTRICT, COUNTRY AND the WORLD. The development of Russia through the eyes of a geographer]. Moscow, Novyj hronograf, 2009. 372 p. (in Russian)

3.  Osnovnye pokazateli vyborochnogo obsledovanija bjudzhetov domashnih hozjajstv i urovnja zhizni naselenija oblasti v 2006—2010 gg [Key indicators of a sample survey of household budgets and living standards in the region 2006—2010]. Vladimir: The Federal State Statistics Service for the Vladimir Region, 2011. 110 p. (in Russian)

4.  Ewing B., Moore D., Goldfinger S., Oursler A., Reed A., Wackernagel M. The Ecological Footprint Atlas 2010. Oakland: Global Footprint Network, 2010б.

5.  NFA 2016 Public Data Package. Global Footprint Network. Oakland: Global Footprint Network, 2016. Retrieved June, 2016, from http://www.footprintnetwork.org/licensing/hooks/download.php?id=37a47b8560e4f868d1440dcbff1f76 fa280da2776360654a353369fa83b165c66.

6.  Wilson, J., & Anielski, M. Ecological Footprint of Canadian Municipalities and Regions. Edmonton: Anielski Management Inc, 2005.

7.  Local, Regional, and Municipal Applications.Global Footprint Network. Oakland: Global Footprint Network, 2014. Retrieved April, 2015, from http://www.footprintnetwork.org/en/index.php/GFN/page/case_stories/#local

8.  Vladimirskaja oblast’ [The Vladimir Region] / Ed. A. N. Bykov. Vladimir: The Federal State Statistics Service for the Vladimir Region., 2015. 548 p. (in Russian)

9.  Lichnye podsobnye hozjajstva naselenija Vladimirskoj oblasti [Personal farms of the population of the Vladimir Region]. Vladimir: The Federal State Statistics Service for the Vladimir Region, 2011. 86 p. (in Russian)

10.       Chambers N., Simmons, C. & Wackernagel, M. Sharing Nature’s Interest. Ecological Footprints as an Indicator of Sustainability. London: Earthscan, 2000.

11.       Ewing B., A. Reed, A. Galli, J. Kitzes, and M. Wackernagel. Calculation Methodology for the National Footprint Accounts, 2010 Edition. Oakland: Global Footprint Network., 2010а.

12.       Jekologicheskij sled sub#ektov Rossijskoj Federacii [The Ecological Footprint of the Russian Federal Entities] / Ed. P. A. Boev & Burenko - WWF. Moscow, WWF Rossii, 2016. 112 p. (in Russian)

13.       Karapetyan K., Trifonova T. Assessment of the Ecological Footprint of An Average Household in the Vladimir Region // Biosciences, Biotechnology Research Asia. 2015. Vol. 12 (3), P. 2869—2878.

14.       Wackernagel M., Monfreda, C., Deumling, D. & Dholakia, R. Household Ecological Footprint Calculator, 1997. — Retrieved July 2005 from http://www.rprogress.org/newprojects/ecolFoot.shtml

15.       Haraldsson H. V., Sverdrup H. Is Eco-living more Sustainable than Conventional Living? Comparing Sustainability Performances between Tow Townships in Southern Sweden // Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. — 2001. — 44 (5) — P. 663—679.